Thunderclap

Author Topic: IWPS 2011 Questions  (Read 8969 times)

HoustonRH7

  • Sonnet
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #30 on: August 29, 2011, 11:28:50 AM »

Here's the deal. We let folks in like this: Former Champs, International Reps, Poets without Access to Slams, Other poets.


But... that's not what Inkera said. She didn't mention former champs at all, and she said "other poets" get priority after international reps if they are further from the host city. Don't mean to nitpick, but that second one is the one I'm having a problem with.

At the very least, I'd like to see the system change so that folks without regular access to a venue, regardless of where they are, get priority over the distance qualifier. Maybe even not use the distance qualifier at all unless everyone who was an official city rep or who wanted to storm and doesn't have access to a venue is in, and there are still slots left for folks who do have a regularly available venue. Thoughts?

amcehn

  • Epic
  • *****
  • Posts: 3201
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #31 on: August 29, 2011, 11:40:34 AM »
Three things.

1. I'm the boss. This is what goes. Inkera is on the EC as was trying to help me/ everyone out while I was out of my office and disconnected from the internet while my flooded home was being taken care of and I was moving to a new not flooded house.

2. You will have to go with the "second one" that I've posted here. This is how it's prioritized. If you look again, you'll see that poets without access to slams (not a venue in your city, on tour) DO have a priority over those "Other Poets" which would include those who DIDN'T win their qualifier at their venue, or those poets who didn't even try at their qualifier. We've always let in past winners of the event that they are registering for, and you know what, only one or two people apply each year that would fall in that category.

3. I'm not sure what exactly you're looking for in your suggestion. We do the distance qualification because we want a VARIETY of voices in a tournament, not just a Midwest voice because the tournament falls in the Midwest. We want the individual WORLD poetry slam to represent the world, not just a section of people close to the event.



Abigail Ehn, Executive Director, PSi
115-1 Rock Ridge Cir
MAFB, ND 58704
(701) 727-6324
psimember@charter.net

Duncan Shields

  • Limerick
  • **
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #32 on: August 29, 2011, 12:34:13 PM »
Like a boss.   :)

HoustonRH7

  • Sonnet
  • ***
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2011, 03:54:44 AM »
Ah, ok. I didn't know you were the person in charge. (side note - might it be a good idea if people with specific titles/jobs could get a little tag by their name?). So, yes and yes. Wouldn't have even brought up the points if I'd known that.

As to the third point, I understand that it's a good idea to try and make sure the storms aren't limited to a bunch of people who live in the host city being able to register because their travel cost is zero. That would be unfair, as would having a bunch of hometown heroes ready to steal the stage. Makes sense.

I'm not sure about the idea that there is a regional sound, though. It's entirely possible that this is because I'm in an area where slams are no closer to each other than about 3 hours, but it seems like while cities within a region may have sounds, the region itself tends to be diversified by the process of people who want to be a part of a particular sound moving to the city with that sound, and people in that city with a different idea of what the sound should be moving to nearby cities and creating variety. I again freely admit that this may just be a symptom of the scene I'm most familiar with being pretty sparse, and welcome hearing that other regions work otherwise.

plunderphonics

  • Sonnet
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #34 on: September 01, 2011, 12:19:36 PM »
Any update on which poets have officially made it in so far?  Obviously referring to registered venues.

Scott Woods

  • Epic
  • *****
  • Posts: 10959
    • View Profile
    • http://www.scottwoodswrites.net
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #35 on: September 01, 2011, 12:38:02 PM »
Any update on which poets have officially made it in so far?  Obviously referring to registered venues.

No one is allowed to ask this one day after the registration window.

jesster

  • Epic
  • *****
  • Posts: 3298
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #36 on: September 01, 2011, 12:53:10 PM »
Any update on which poets have officially made it in so far?  Obviously referring to registered venues.

No one is allowed to ask this one day after the registration window.

Of course they are ALLOWED to ask... they should just expect either polite reminders that it's too soon to tell or open ridicule. ;)

-Jesster
AKA Jesse Parent
Salt City Indie Arts
PSi Executive Council Member - Secretary

Scott Woods

  • Epic
  • *****
  • Posts: 10959
    • View Profile
    • http://www.scottwoodswrites.net
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #37 on: September 01, 2011, 12:53:42 PM »
Open ridicule it is!

amcehn

  • Epic
  • *****
  • Posts: 3201
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #38 on: September 01, 2011, 02:05:09 PM »
Check out the iWPS 2011 Information Update forum. You'll see all of the dates there.
Abigail Ehn, Executive Director, PSi
115-1 Rock Ridge Cir
MAFB, ND 58704
(701) 727-6324
psimember@charter.net

plunderphonics

  • Sonnet
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: IWPS 2011 Questions
« Reply #39 on: September 01, 2011, 03:22:48 PM »
Open ridicule it is!

NOOO!!

Sorry. I just knew that some people knew they were in and I was wondering how.

Allow the ridicule to flow like wine.