1
General Discussion / Two Further Questions for All EC Candidates
« on: March 02, 2012, 09:16:27 AM »
note: I'm posting this in a separate thread in hopes of it's being more readily noticeable--moderators, feel free to merge this with the other thread, preferably after some replies have come through.
Hey guys!
It's really great to see such a large and varied list of EC candidates this year; I wish I could be in Denver for the meeting, I'm sure it's going to be a fight to remember.
That said, here are my questions for the EC candidates this year.
1) The following is the second of five amended articles of incorporation for PSI as listed on the website:
"To enhance the perception of literary merit and legitimacy of performance poetry as an art form."
What the above mean to you? Do you believe that we are currently successful in the enhancement of perceived literary merit and legitimacy of performance poetry? If not, what do you, as a member of the EC, hope to do in order to further this process? Or, for incumbents, what do you see as roadblocks to achieving further literary merit for our art form? Can you propose a way to circumvent these roadblocks within your next term?
2) There has been a lot of talk regarding the possibility of PSI events being held within a limited number of host cities. How do you feel about this idea? Are your for or against it? Explain your position.
That's all for now, I know it's late in the game but I'd sure love an answer on these, and I imagine I'm not the only one
Hey guys!
It's really great to see such a large and varied list of EC candidates this year; I wish I could be in Denver for the meeting, I'm sure it's going to be a fight to remember.
That said, here are my questions for the EC candidates this year. 1) The following is the second of five amended articles of incorporation for PSI as listed on the website:
"To enhance the perception of literary merit and legitimacy of performance poetry as an art form."
What the above mean to you? Do you believe that we are currently successful in the enhancement of perceived literary merit and legitimacy of performance poetry? If not, what do you, as a member of the EC, hope to do in order to further this process? Or, for incumbents, what do you see as roadblocks to achieving further literary merit for our art form? Can you propose a way to circumvent these roadblocks within your next term?
2) There has been a lot of talk regarding the possibility of PSI events being held within a limited number of host cities. How do you feel about this idea? Are your for or against it? Explain your position.
That's all for now, I know it's late in the game but I'd sure love an answer on these, and I imagine I'm not the only one
