6
« on: March 07, 2010, 12:50:10 PM »
eric----good points did not take into consideration the fact that some bouts score higher than othert ie a late bout chances are has a higher score than an early bout ----i feel this the rank system is the best way to go looking at it this way-----i meant no insult by the rockstar thing---i really wa not trying to insult anyone---i do agree that the group piece show is one of my favorites i am partial to team pieces ever siince mouth almighty tore it up and opened my eyes jto the dynamic of the group voice---however i do feel the quality of writing in the indiviual is increasing in large part to the number of high school slammers and college slammers who are now of adult age and out of school the early developement of those young poets is paying large diviidends ----but am curious as to why this is not reflected in the group work being done----not to say that at the group piece finals was not great last year i had a blasty watching it-----seattles sand piece was a really well done duet----however i still feel that a team who has qualified for the semis should not be given the oppurtunity to pick and choose what direction they want to pursue---with such a largte field there are always gonna be great teams that dont get a chance and whose only oppurtunity to read that extra night is the gp show---and to have a higher ranked team who coould take that from them because they choose to be in the showcase rather than continue in the competition they came for in the first place seems a little unfair --- i know the nature of slam is unfair and that it is just a gimic to get buts in seats to hear poems- slam has done this for poetery more than anything else-however i think that knowing the unfair nature we should strive to insert fairness where ever possible